The repeat.
Haiz, sad to say, liverpool lost to chelsea 4-1, after seeing the comments, thought it wasn't what we deserved, then again, once it was 2-1 at half time, we had to lose, no doubt about it.
That loser already said he doesn't care about boring tactics. Therefore they sit back and wait for liverpool to attack, more cautious in EPL? Which idiot said that crap, liverpool no choice but to go all out, then of course, there's always a risk in going out attacking, and paid dearly with 2 goals.
Drogba once again, the useless diver, was said to be instrumental in the win. Once again, crap. He miskick the ball which fell to joe cole and lead to the goal, you call that assist arh? Pure luck, which was denied to us once again. Then lam par very sialan, ask supporters to keep quiet, in the end got a yellow card. Think he very good, bo lam par still ask ppl to shut up. Then again, he got the right to kao peh kao bu, because he can complain that he does not have lam par, anot why his parents name him that, of course is to make up for his loss there la.
I was reading the forum, can a billionaire buy the Champions League? Can a billionaire buy fans who sing and support their team even though they were 4-1 down? OBVIOUSLY NOT, nobody and no wealth can buy such fans. Billionaire can only buy fans after winning this and that, then what's the point of that?
Bill shankly may be right afterall, "soccer is about life and death." Maybe in that era where everything was peaceful, no disasters, no wars. I believed he said that because the passions of the fans for the club. Can mourinho say that about chelsea fans, definitely no. Maybe yes, but who will care, half the time he's playing with his stupid mind games.
But all and all, liverpool were the lousier team, chelsea were more clinical in front of goal, and that i don't mean the striker is, the team is. Think they should be given that little bit of credit. Afterall, it was the fortress Anfield, nobody comes here and expect a win easily, and look at how hard they need to fight.
Anyway, it's just one loss, and chelsea would most probably beat all the top teams, so wouldn't do much to affect our position in the EPL.
Just back from the chemistry paper 3, essay questions. It was darn stupid, look at the marks allocation. Topics that were taught first half of the year took up 25, and the 2nd half took up 35. What the fuck la, they should concentrate more on the 2nd half right, Damn bloody fucked up, how to get A like that. I would have much more confidence if it was more of a 2nd half year topics exam. Anyway, wasn't that bad, just couldn't get that 80 to push up my jct marks.
Tomorrow physics...haiz
That loser already said he doesn't care about boring tactics. Therefore they sit back and wait for liverpool to attack, more cautious in EPL? Which idiot said that crap, liverpool no choice but to go all out, then of course, there's always a risk in going out attacking, and paid dearly with 2 goals.
Drogba once again, the useless diver, was said to be instrumental in the win. Once again, crap. He miskick the ball which fell to joe cole and lead to the goal, you call that assist arh? Pure luck, which was denied to us once again. Then lam par very sialan, ask supporters to keep quiet, in the end got a yellow card. Think he very good, bo lam par still ask ppl to shut up. Then again, he got the right to kao peh kao bu, because he can complain that he does not have lam par, anot why his parents name him that, of course is to make up for his loss there la.
I was reading the forum, can a billionaire buy the Champions League? Can a billionaire buy fans who sing and support their team even though they were 4-1 down? OBVIOUSLY NOT, nobody and no wealth can buy such fans. Billionaire can only buy fans after winning this and that, then what's the point of that?
Bill shankly may be right afterall, "soccer is about life and death." Maybe in that era where everything was peaceful, no disasters, no wars. I believed he said that because the passions of the fans for the club. Can mourinho say that about chelsea fans, definitely no. Maybe yes, but who will care, half the time he's playing with his stupid mind games.
But all and all, liverpool were the lousier team, chelsea were more clinical in front of goal, and that i don't mean the striker is, the team is. Think they should be given that little bit of credit. Afterall, it was the fortress Anfield, nobody comes here and expect a win easily, and look at how hard they need to fight.
Anyway, it's just one loss, and chelsea would most probably beat all the top teams, so wouldn't do much to affect our position in the EPL.
Just back from the chemistry paper 3, essay questions. It was darn stupid, look at the marks allocation. Topics that were taught first half of the year took up 25, and the 2nd half took up 35. What the fuck la, they should concentrate more on the 2nd half right, Damn bloody fucked up, how to get A like that. I would have much more confidence if it was more of a 2nd half year topics exam. Anyway, wasn't that bad, just couldn't get that 80 to push up my jct marks.
Tomorrow physics...haiz
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home